THE KOP

Liverpool. The football. The city.
Independent & unofficial.

History · The Kop editorial · 22 October 2026 · 1 min read

1986: a derby for the Double.

Liverpool won the cup. Everton made the contest. A city final deserves both halves of its story.

The Kop stand at Anfield in May 2024.
The Kop, May 2024. A contemporary view, not the old standing terrace.FYI2023 · CC0 · Image details

The 1986 FA Cup final ended Liverpool 3, Everton 1. Gary Lineker put Everton ahead; Ian Rush scored twice for Liverpool, with Craig Johnston scoring the other goal. Victory completed the league and cup Double in Kenny Dalglish’s first season as player-manager.

The sequence matters as much as the final number. Liverpool had to come from behind. This was a final against a serious opponent, not an empty stage set up for a celebration.

Rivalry can survive a complete account

A Liverpool publication should be able to enjoy the result without making Everton disappear from the match. The strength of the other side is part of the achievement. Pretending every derby victory was easy makes the winner’s task smaller.

The same applies to the city outside Wembley. “A divided city” is an easy headline, but it cannot describe every household, workplace or friendship. Nor should a warm recollection be stretched into a claim that everyone shared the same friendly experience. Let people tell the part they actually knew.

Two colours in one photograph

A family picture containing red and blue scarves may be more revealing than another isolated image of the trophy. Who travelled together? Who wanted to forget the return journey? Which programme ended up in whose drawer?

Those are questions for witnesses, not invitations for an automated site to manufacture dialogue. If a story comes from a relative rather than your own memory, say so. If the photograph’s date is uncertain, leave the uncertainty visible.

The final is a natural bridge between this fanzine and our Everton counterpart. We can tell it from different loyalties while agreeing on the result and respecting the same evidence. The argument is more interesting when neither side needs to invent its past.

Reading & sources

What is your take?

Were there red and blue scarves in the same family photograph in 1986?

Join the conversation →

Keep reading