THE KOP

Liverpool. The football. The city.
Independent & unofficial.

News & opinion · The Kop editorial · 22 October 2026 · 2 min read

Liverpool 4–3 Villarreal: enjoy it, then ask questions.

The comeback and the concession of three goals can both matter. Reaction to the match on 20 October 2026.

The Kop stand at Anfield in May 2024.
The Kop, May 2024. A contemporary view, not the old standing terrace.FYI2023 · CC0 · Image details

Liverpool came from 2–0 down to beat Villarreal 4–3 at Anfield on 20 October, making it three wins from three in this season’s Champions League league phase. Liverpool’s report and Villarreal’s own account agree on the central sequence: a two-goal away lead, parity by half-time, Liverpool ahead after the interval, then a late Villarreal goal.

Alexis Mac Allister scored twice for Liverpool, with Ronald Araujo and Florian Wirtz also on the scoresheet. The source reports are linked below. What follows is our reaction to that record, rather than an invented eyewitness account or a set of unsupported player ratings.

Joy does not require amnesia

Coming back to win is a proper reason to enjoy a football match. It is also possible to ask why the comeback was needed. Supporters should not have to choose between celebrating a result and wanting a team to concede fewer opportunities.

A scoreline on its own cannot identify the cause of every defensive problem. Nor does an exciting finish prove that a team can safely repeat the same route next week. The useful conversation starts with specific passages of play and leaves room for an opponent doing something well.

Read the other club’s report

Villarreal’s account gives its own emphasis to the early lead and late pursuit of an equaliser. Reading it alongside Liverpool’s is a simple way to loosen the grip of a single celebratory narrative. The facts can agree while the significance is presented differently.

Our view: take the three points and the pleasure of the recovery, then keep the questions open. Which part of the improvement looked repeatable? Which problem still needs work? Bring a moment from the match to the discussion, with a source or a timestamp if you have one. “Brilliant” and “disaster” are both short words; neither is much of an explanation.

Reading & sources

What is your take?

What changed the match for you, and which concern survived the comeback?

Join the conversation →

Keep reading